JOM KITA KE POLITEKNIK

The Impact of Access to Addiction Specialist on Attitudes, Beliefs and Hospital-Based Opioid Use Disorder Related Care: A Survey of Hospitalist Physicians (Record no. 1714)

MARC details
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Calcaterra, Susan L
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 959
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The Impact of Access to Addiction Specialist on Attitudes, Beliefs and Hospital-Based Opioid Use Disorder Related Care: A Survey of Hospitalist Physicians
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2022.
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note /pmc/articles/PMC7541600/
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note /pubmed/32267807
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for complications related to opioid use disorder (OUD) are increasing. Hospitalists care for most hospitalized patients in the United States, yet little is known about their attitudes, beliefs, and clinical practices regarding OUD-related care. METHODS: We distributed an online survey to hospitalists in the United States to measure how access to addiction specialists affected attitudes and beliefs regarding hospital-based OUD care, OUD screening practices, naloxone prescribing, and buprenorphine initiation. RESULTS: Among 262 respondents, 67.9% (n=178) reported having access to addiction specialists. While 84.5% (n=221) reported often or always caring for patients with OUD, 48.2% (n=126) rarely or never screened for OUD, 57.1% (n=149) rarely or never prescribed or recommended naloxone as harm reduction, and 88.9% (n=233) rarely or never initiated buprenorphine. In multivariable analyses, compared to hospitalists without access to addiction specialists, hospitalist with access to addiction specialists were more likely to feel supported to screen and refer patients to treatment (aOR = 4.4, 95% CI 2.1 - 9.1; ρ<0.001), to be aware of local treatment resources (aOR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.8 - 6.3; ρ<0.001), and refer patients to treatment (aOR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.7 - 5.6; ρ<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many hospitalists do not provide life-saving treatment to patients with OUD. Access to addiction specialists may increase provision of OUD-related care by hospitalists.
540 ## - TERMS GOVERNING USE AND REPRODUCTION NOTE
Terms governing use and reproduction
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note en
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Article
655 7# - INDEX TERM--GENRE/FORM
Genre/form data or focus term Text
Source of term local
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Binswanger, Ingrid A
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 960
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Edelman, E. Jennifer
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 961
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name McNair, Bryan K
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 962
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Wakeman, Sarah E.
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 963
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name O'Connor, Patrick G
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 964
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Subst Abus
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2020.1748169">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2020.1748169</a>
Public note Connect to this object online.

No items available.