JOM KITA KE POLITEKNIK

Comparison between cuff-based and invasive systolic blood pressure amplification (Record no. 2202)

MARC details
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Bui Tan, V.
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2633
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparison between cuff-based and invasive systolic blood pressure amplification
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2022-10-01.
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note /pmc/articles/PMC7614121/
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note /pubmed/36052526
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Accurate measurement of central blood pressure (BP) using upper arm cuff-based methods is associated with several factors, including determining the level of systolic BP (SBP) amplification. This study aimed to determine the agreement between cuff-based and invasively measured SBP amplification. Patients undergoing coronary angiography had invasive SBP amplification (brachial SBP - central SBP) measured simultaneously with cuff-based SBP amplification using a commercially available central BP device (device 1: Sphygmocor Xcel; n = 171, 70% men, 60 ± 10 years) and a now superseded model of a central BP device (device 2: Uscom BP+; n = 52, 83% men, 62 ± 10 years). Mean difference (±2SD, limits of agreement) between cuff-based and invasive SBP amplification was 4 mmHg (−12, +20 mmHg, P < 0.001) for device 1 and −2 mmHg (−14, +10 mmHg, P = 0.10) for device 2. Both devices systematically overestimated SBP amplification at lower levels and underestimated at higher levels of invasive SBP amplification, but with stronger bias for device 1 (r = −0.68 vs. r = −0.52; Z = 2.72; P = 0.008). Concordance of cuff-based and invasive SBP amplification across quartiles of invasive SBP amplification was low, particularly in the lowest and highest quartiles. The root mean square errors from regression between cuff-based central SBP and brachial SBP were significantly lower (indicating less variability) than from invasive regression models (P < 0.001). Irrespective of the difference from invasive measurements, cuff-based estimates of SBP amplification showed evidence of proportional systematic bias and had less individual variability. These observations could provide insights on how to improve the performance of cuff-based central BP.
540 ## - TERMS GOVERNING USE AND REPRODUCTION NOTE
Terms governing use and reproduction
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note en
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Article
655 7# - INDEX TERM--GENRE/FORM
Genre/form data or focus term Text
Source of term local
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Picone, Dean S.
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2634
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Schultz, Martin G.
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2635
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Armstrong, Matthew K.
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2636
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Peng, Xiaoqing
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2637
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Black, J. Andrew
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2638
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Dwyer, Nathan
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2639
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Roberts-Thomson, Philip
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2640
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Adams, Heath
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2641
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hughes, Alun D.
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2642
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Sharman, James E.
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2643
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note J Hypertens
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003228">http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003228</a>
Public note Connect to this object online.

No items available.