JOM KITA KE POLITEKNIK

Time course of learning sequence representations in action imagery practice (Record no. 2263)

MARC details
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Dahm, Stephan F.
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2810
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Time course of learning sequence representations in action imagery practice
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2023-02-01.
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note /pmc/articles/PMC7614144/
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note /pubmed/36549085
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Action imagery practice (AIP) is effective to improve motor performance in a variety of tasks, though it is often less effective than action execution practice (AEP). In sequence learning, AIP and AEP result in the acquisition of effector-independent representations. However, it is unresolved whether effector-dependent representations can be acquired in AIP. In the present study, we investigated the acquisition of effector-independent representations and effector-dependent representations in AEP and AIP in an implicit sequence learning task (a visual serial-reaction-time task, involving a twelve-element sequence). Participants performed six sessions, each starting with tests. A practice sequence, a mirror sequence, and a different sequence were tested with the practice and transfer hand. In the first four sessions, after the tests, two groups performed either AIP (N = 50) or AEP (N = 54). Improvement in the different sequence indicated sequence-unspecific learning in both AEP and AIP. Importantly, reaction times of the practice hand became shorter in the practice sequence than in the other sequences, indicating implicit sequence learning in both, AEP and AIP. This effect was stronger in the practice hand than in the transfer hand, indicating effector-dependent sequence representations in both AEP and AIP. However, effector-dependent sequence representations were stronger in AEP than in AIP. No significant differences between groups were observed in the transfer hand, although effector-independent sequence representations were observed in AEP only. In conclusion, AIP promotes not only sequence-unspecific stimulus-response coupling and anticipations of the subsequent stimuli, but also anticipations of the subsequent responses.
540 ## - TERMS GOVERNING USE AND REPRODUCTION NOTE
Terms governing use and reproduction
540 ## - TERMS GOVERNING USE AND REPRODUCTION NOTE
Terms governing use and reproduction https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note en
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Article
655 7# - INDEX TERM--GENRE/FORM
Genre/form data or focus term Text
Source of term local
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Rieger, Martina
Relator term author
9 (RLIN) 2811
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Hum Mov Sci
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2022.103050">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2022.103050</a>
Public note Connect to this object online.

No items available.