TY - BOOK AU - Herrington,William G. AU - Staplin,Natalie AU - Wanner,Christoph AU - Green,Jennifer B. AU - Hauske,Sibylle J. AU - Emberson,Jonathan R. AU - Preiss,David AU - Judge,Parminder AU - Mayne,Kaitlin J. AU - Ng,Sarah Y.A. AU - Sammons,Emily AU - Zhu,Doreen AU - Hill,Michael AU - Stevens,Will AU - Wallendszus,Karl AU - Brenner,Susanne AU - Cheung,Alfred K. AU - Liu,Zhi-Hong AU - Li,Jing AU - Hooi,Lai Seong AU - Liu,Wen AU - Kadowaki,Takashi AU - Nangaku,Masaomi AU - Levin,Adeera AU - Cherney,David AU - Maggioni,Aldo P. AU - Pontremoli,Roberto AU - Deo,Rajat AU - Goto,Shinya AU - Rossello,Xavier AU - Tuttle,Katherine R. AU - Steubl,Dominik AU - Petrini,Michaela AU - Massey,Dan AU - Eilbracht,Jens AU - Brueckmann,Martina AU - Landray,Martin J. AU - Baigent,Colin AU - Haynes,Richard TI - Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease PY - 2023///-01-12 KW - Text KW - local N1 - /pmc/articles/PMC7614055; /pubmed/36331190 N2 - BACKGROUND: This study, the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, was designed to assess the effects of empagliflozin in a broad range of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at risk of progression. METHODS: We randomly assigned 6609 participants to empagliflozin (10mg once daily) versus matching placebo. Eligibility required an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥20 to <45 ml/minute/1.73m(2); or ≥45 to <90 ml/minute/1.73m(2) with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) of ≥200 mg/g. The primary outcome was a composite of kidney disease progression (end-stage kidney disease, a sustained eGFR <10 ml/minute/1.73m(2), a sustained decline in eGFR of ≥40%, or a renal death) or death from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS: During a median of 2.0 years follow-up, a primary outcome event occurred in 432 of 3304 patients (13.1%) in the empagliflozin group and in 558 of 3305 patients (16.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.82; P<0.001), with consistent results in those with or without diabetes and across the range of eGFR studied. There were fewer hospitalizations from any cause in the empagliflozin group (0.86; 0.78 to 0.95, P=0.003), but no statistically significant effect on hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death (4.0% vs 4.6%), or death from any cause (4.5% vs 5.1%). The rates of serious adverse events were broadly similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin reduced the risk of the composite outcome of kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death in a wide range of patients at risk of CKD progression. (Funding:Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and others; Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03594110, EuDRACT: 2017-002971-24) UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2204233 ER -