000			02877 am a22002653u 4500
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aNakamura, Masatoshi _eauthor _91611
700	1	0	_aSato, Shigeru _eauthor _91612
700	1	0	_aKiyono, Ryosuke _eauthor _91613
700	1	0	_aYoshida, Riku _eauthor _91614
700	1	0	_aYasaka, Koki _eauthor _91615
700	1	0	_aYahata, Kaoru _eauthor _91616
700	1	0	_aKonrad, Andreas _eauthor _91617
245	0	0	_aComparison between foam rolling with and without vibration on passive and active plantar flexor muscle properties
260			_c2022-12-01.
500			_a/pmc/articles/PMC7613848/
500			_a/pubmed/34474432
520			_aAlthough foam rolling interventions with and without vibration have been used to increase flexibility in the field of sports, their effects on passive and active properties remain unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effects of foam rolling interventions on range of motion (ROM), shear elastic modulus, plantar flexor muscle strength, and jump performance. This randomized, controlled, crossover study included 16 healthy male participants who visited the laboratory three times (control condition, foam rolling condition, and vibration foam rolling condition), each with an interval of >72 h. In both foam rolling and vibration foam rolling conditions, participants were instructed to perform 60-s bouts of intervention for three sets, with 30-s rest between each set. In the vibration foam rolling condition, the intensity of vibration was set at a frequency of 48 Hz. Dorsiflexion (DF) ROM, shear elastic modulus, plantar flexor muscle strength, and drop jump height were determined before and after the rolling intervention. Our results showed a similar increase in DF ROM (p < 0.01, d = 0.51; p < 0.01, d = 0.65, respectively) and passive torque at DF ROM (p = 0.02, d = 0.51 and p < 0.01, d = 0.65, respectively) after foam rolling and vibration foam rolling. Medial gastrocnemius shear elastic modulus decreased only after vibration foam rolling (p < 0.01, d = 0.44). No significant main effects of time were observed in maximal voluntary isometric contraction torque (F = 2.0, p = 0.15, η(p)(2) = 0.119) and drop jump height (F = 1.5, p = 0.24, η(p)(2) = 0.091) after both interventions. Maximal voluntary concentric contraction torque showed a significant main effect of time (F = 7.59, p = 0.02, η(p)(2) = 0.336). However, only after foam rolling, the maximal voluntary concentric contraction torque significantly decreased (p = 0.01, d = 0.39). Our results suggest that vibration foam rolling effectively alters passive muscle properties without decreasing muscle strength and performance.
540			_a
546			_aen
690			_aArticle
655	7		_aText _2local
786	0		_nJ Strength Cond Res
856	4	1	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004123 _zConnect to this object online.
999			_c1725 _d1725