000 03640 am a22004453u 4500
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aMullins, Kristin
_eauthor
_92695
700 1 0 _aCanal, Enrique
_eauthor
_92696
700 1 0 _aOuch, Pidor
_eauthor
_92697
700 1 0 _aPrasetyo, Didot
_eauthor
_92698
700 1 0 _aTagoe, Janice
_eauthor
_92699
700 1 0 _aAttram, Naiki
_eauthor
_92700
700 1 0 _aYeboah, Clara
_eauthor
_92701
700 1 0 _aKumordjie, Selassi
_eauthor
_92702
700 1 0 _aFox, Anne
_eauthor
_92703
700 1 0 _aLetizia, Andrew G.
_eauthor
_92704
700 1 0 _aRachlin, Audrey
_eauthor
_92705
700 1 0 _aNguyen, Hung Manh
_eauthor
_92706
700 1 0 _aRobinson, Matthew T.
_eauthor
_92707
700 1 0 _aVongsouvath, Manivanh
_eauthor
_92708
700 1 0 _aDavong, Viengmon
_eauthor
_92709
700 1 0 _aMayxay, Mayfong
_eauthor
_92710
700 1 0 _aSimons, Mark P.
_eauthor
_92711
700 1 0 _aCaranci, Angela
_eauthor
_92712
700 1 0 _aNewton, Paul N.
_eauthor
_92713
700 1 0 _aRichards, Allen L.
_eauthor
_92714
700 1 0 _aFarris, Christina M.
_eauthor
_92715
245 0 0 _aBartonella species in Cambodia, Ghana, Laos, and Peru: results from vector and sero-surveys
260 _c2023-01-01.
500 _a/pmc/articles/PMC7614129/
500 _a/pubmed/36633562
520 _aBartonella species are fastidious Gram negative vector-borne bacteria with a wide range of mammalian reservoirs. While it is understood that some species Bartonella are human pathogens, the extent of human exposure to Bartonella species (both pathogenic and non-pathogenic) has yet to be fully understood. To this end, residual sera from participants enrolled in undifferentiated fever studies in Cambodia, Ghana, Laos, and Peru were screened for the presence of IgG antibodies against B. quintana and B. henselae, using the FOCUS diagnostics Dual Spot- Bartonella IgG Immunofluorescence assay. Forty-eight patients with suspected or confirmed B. bacilliformis exposure or infection in Peru, were screened to assess cross-reactivity of the FOCUS assay for IgG against other Bartonella species. Ten of 13 patients with confirmed B. bacilliformis infection were Bartonella-specific IgG positive and overall, 36/48 of the samples were positive. Additionally, 79/206, 44/200, 101/180, and 57/100 of samples from Peru, Laos, Cambodia, and Ghana, respectively were Bartonella-specific IgG positive. Further, ectoparasites pools from Cambodia, Laos, and Peru were tested using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for the presence of Bartonella DNA. Of the sand-fly pools collected in Peru, 0/196 were qPCR positive; 15/140 flea pools collected in Cambodia were qPCR positive; while 0/105 ticks, 0/22 fleas, and 0/3 louse pools collected in Laos tested positive for Bartonella DNA. Evidence of Bartonella in fleas from Cambodia supports the possibility that humans are exposed to Bartonella through this traditional vector. However, Bartonella species were not found in fleas, ticks, or lice from Laos, or sandflies from Peru. This could account for the lower positive serology among the population in Laos and the strictly localized nature of B. bacillformis infections in Peru. Human exposure to Bartonella species and Bartonella as a human pathogen warrants further investigation.
540 _a
540 _ahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) International license.
546 _aen
690 _aArticle
655 7 _aText
_2local
786 0 _nVector Borne Zoonotic Dis
856 4 1 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2021.0090
_zConnect to this object online.
999 _c2060
_d2060