000 | 03509 am a22003493u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aBurrola-Mendez, Yohali _eauthor _92644 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aKamalakannan, Sureshkumar _eauthor _92645 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aRushton, Paula W. _eauthor _92646 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aBouziane, Selsabil-A. _eauthor _92647 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aGiesbrecht, Ed _eauthor _92648 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aKirby, R. Lee _eauthor _92649 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aGowran, Rosemary J. _eauthor _92650 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aRusaw, David F. _eauthor _92651 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aTasiemski, Tomasz _eauthor _92652 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aGoldberg, Mary _eauthor _92653 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aTofani, Marco _eauthor _92654 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aPedersen, Jessica P. _eauthor _92655 |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_aPearlman, Jon _eauthor _92656 |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aWheelchair service provision education for healthcare professional students, healthcare personnel and educators across low- to high-resourced settings: a scoping review |
260 | _c2022-04-18. | ||
500 | _a/pmc/articles/PMC7614122/ | ||
500 | _a/pubmed/35436160 | ||
520 | _aPURPOSE: This review aimed to collate and summarize available research literature about wheelchair service provision education available to healthcare professional students, healthcare personnel and educators across low- to high-resourced settings. METHODS: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological steps for scoping reviews were followed. Included studies were mainly sourced from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Academic Search Complete and ProQuest. Independent title, abstract and full-text screening with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria was performed. All screening and extraction were performed independently by two authors. A thematic approach was used to synthesize results. Data extracted from included studies were charted according to a template that we created. The study quality was also appraised. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles were included (11, 36% from high-income settings) with 12 (48%) observational studies and 13 (52%) experimental studies. The literature addressed three main topics: (1) assessing wheelchair service provision knowledge, (2) implementing training interventions using in-person, online and/or hybrid learning approaches and (3) describing current wheelchair service provision education globally. The most frequently reported training programs used were the Wheelchair Skills Program and the World Health Organization Wheelchair Service Training Package − Basic Level. CONCLUSION: Limited information has been published about the integration of wheelchair content into the curricula of professional rehabilitation programs. Efforts to build international partnerships, improve the quality and currency of training programs and build resources that can assist educators in the integration of wheelchair-related content into professional rehabilitation programs should be prioritized. | ||
540 | _a | ||
540 | _ahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. | ||
546 | _aen | ||
690 | _aArticle | ||
655 | 7 |
_aText _2local |
|
786 | 0 | _nDisabil Rehabil Assist Technol | |
856 | 4 | 1 |
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2037757 _zConnect to this object online. |
999 |
_c2331 _d2331 |